Talk:Fiat Multipla

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Davey2010 in topic Vilebrequin 1000tipla

Split proposal

edit

Two cars/lines from different eras (50s/60s and 90s/2000s); perhaps vaguely similar in intent, but really this article is covering two different things and for that reason should be split into two. It might encourage more detail on the older Multipla to be added too. Fourohfour 18:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think the '50s/'60s 600 Multipla should be merged with the existing Fiat 600 page, since it is merely a variation of that model. Marshall Stax 01:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Done; if the 600-based model warrants its own article, that's fine; if it doesn't, it belongs more closely in the Fiat 600 article anyway. Fourohfour 11:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Needs picture of current version

edit

This page needs a picture of the redesigned Multipla.79.2.242.95 23:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Car of the Year

edit

Top Gear (original format) made this car of the year in 2000. Djcater 04:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Top 50 ugly cars

edit

I do not find that article relevant and anyhow trustworthy. It is not an aftermath of any vote. It is just a bunch of pictures of cars, which most of them are not ugly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.229.210.149 (talk) 10:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiat Multipla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vilebrequin 1000tipla

edit

I trimmed this section on a single modified car as it appears irrelevant. I would suggest deleting it entirely but perhaps it should be discussed first.  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mr.choppers, Personally I would support removing, Plenty of YouTubers mess around with cars so I don't see why 1 Youtuber should have a section over others who obviously don't. Their YouTube is all in French and none of their videos have made it into the news[1] so I dont really see why they'd need a section or what makes them special over anyone else?. –Davey2010Talk 19:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply