Talk:Fidelity Investments

Darfur

Shouldn't something be added about the controversy dealing with PetroChina and Darfur? Worldthoughts 17:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

There was, however they were removed after Fidelity divested their assets in Petrochina. Black Harry 17:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo fid.jpg

Image:Logo fid.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Subprime mortgage

Removed the improperly sighted material on subprime mortgage as it was innaccurate. Apologies for the confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.226.5 (talk) 19:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Cameron Pettigrew

This seems a little biased..."being grilled", etc. THere should be a mention that Pettigrew knew of the policies against gambling at work and that he chose to participate on company time using company resources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.246.101.181 (talk) 04:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Abigail Johnson

Quote in article: "October 2005, it was reported that she had sold a "significant" portion of her shares to family trusts, and that there are doubts as to whether she is still in line to succeed her father." 2005 is a long time ago and she is still at the head of the company. Recommend that quote be deleted and, if there is any later indication that she will not, in the future, become the head of the company, then such reference may be used. Otherwise, a nine year old reference which appears to not have been an accurate prediction should not be included in this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.193.220.29 (talk) 18:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Further material "Abigail Johnson Replaces Father Edward As CEO Of Fidelity," http://www.forbes.com/sites/carlodonnell/2014/10/13/abigail-johnson-replaces-father-edward-as-ceo-of-fidelity/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.193.220.29 (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed Edits to Fidelity Investments Page

AUM US $3.9 trillion https://www.fidelity.com/about-fidelity/our-company/asset-management

Number of employees 41,0000+ (2014) https://www.fidelity.com/about-fidelity/fidelity-by-numbers/corporate-statistics

Investor centers in over 184 locations throughout the U.S. https://www.fidelity.com/about-fidelity/fidelity-by-numbers/corporate-statistics

Please add site locations: Smithfield, RI and New York/New Jersey to "Ownership and Operations" paragraph and remove "American Fork, Utah" https://www.fidelity.com/about-fidelity/fidelity-by-numbers/corporate-statistics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katherinelspring (talk • contribs) 19:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fidelity Investments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325031453/http://www.investoo.co.uk/fidelity-officially-re-brands-as-fidelity-worldwide-investment/ to http://www.investoo.co.uk/fidelity-officially-re-brands-as-fidelity-worldwide-investment/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Rusk lawsuit

I've removed an added paragraph about a lawsuit against Fidelity for the second time in one day. I don't think mention of this particular lawsuit satisfies WP:V or WP:UNDUE - I can find no coverage of the court case in any news or other secondary reliable source. The paragraph also makes a couple of judgement statements about the uniqueness of the court proceedings, which also lacks any secondary sources. My guess is that the anonymous editor that keeps inserting it (and inserted similar text here and elsewhere about two months ago) is somehow related to the case. Again, lacking coverage in secondary sources, this is a pretty clear case of WP:UNDUE and possibly WP:COATRACK. --FyzixFighter (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

AUM vs. AUA

The second sentence of the intro is wildly inaccurate: "Established in 1946, the company is one of the largest asset managers in the world, with $13.7 trillion in assets under management...." Per their website[1], Fidelity had $14.1T in AUA as of June 30, 2024. I don't know how Fidelity publicly discloses AUM (vs. discretionary assets), but it is widely reported to be in the $3–5T range. This sentences confuses the two. 192.223.242.21 (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)