This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Edit warring and possible Conflict of Interest/Paid editing
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am concerned that User:PeterDavid1980 has repeatedly (6 times now) deleted what I perceive as well-cited content, based upon Reliable news sources, which have now been put back in by three different editors, so that statements not conducive to the good image of this topic are no longer visible. (Specifically, it would seem, allegations that Hong Kong participants were prevented from participating as a result of threats from China.) I have asked that editor to stop edit-warring and to declare whether or not they have a Conflict of Interest under our WP:PAID policy, and specifically whether they are employed by Fierté Montréal, which seems quite possible. I have added back in the content that was deleted with this diff, and I ask that editors discuss here the appropriateness of that content remaining, and/or its permanent removal. If it remains, is it relevant, well cited and neutral in tone, and based on proper sources?
However, I do not propose to participate directly in these discussions as I know nothing about the topic, and my involvement is purely to monitor recent changes and prevent vandals and POV editors from damaging or influencing articles. However, removal of content again by the named editor without a declaration or denial of any WP:COI or WP:PAID editing on their talk page, and any further edit warring may result in those editors being taken to WP:ANI, and possibly being blocked. Courtesy ping to @Amigao and IlluminatingTrooper:. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 01:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
