Talk:Fifth Avenue/53rd Street station

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fifth Avenue / 53rd Street (IND Queens Boulevard Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150113015344/http://www.stationreporter.net/etrain.htm to http://www.stationreporter.net/etrain.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100922060746/http://www.stationreporter.net/mxtrain.htm to http://www.stationreporter.net/mxtrain.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that formerly, subway riders trying to exit the Fifth Avenue/53rd Street station in the evening were trapped behind a locked gate? Source: NY Times
  • ALT1:... that the Fifth Avenue/53rd Street station in New York City contains posters showing objects at nearby museums such as the Museum of Modern Art? Source: Interiors

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Misty Mountain

Improved to Good Article status by Kew Gardens 613 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 21:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - SubwayNut, a self-published source, is used quite heavily.
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited: - ALT1 needs to have a citation immediately after the end of the sentence ("...each platform.") for DYK compliance. The hook tweaked so that it is "showing objects at" or however the book source is wording it; as it stands, the article and hook do not match.
• Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: Going to AGF on the sourcing in ALT1, which I find to be equally interesting to ALT0. Just needs a QPQ and those changes I mentioned. The wording of ALT0 needs a bit of work too, since it flows awkwardly. Perhaps "... that some locked exit gates at Fifth Avenue/53rd Street station trapped passengers attempting to exit in the evenings?" SounderBruce 04:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

• • @SounderBruce: Thanks for the review. Subway Nut is really used only as a photo citation. I have trimmed its use considerably, nonetheless. I also have now done a QPQ. epicgenius (talk) 14:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    • The hook citation issue has been fixed, and I'm still 50-50 on allowing the SubwayNut citations to remain in place, but I won't give you a hard time over it. Just make sure to scrub them from future GAs, because it is really borderline. SounderBruce 06:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
      • @SounderBruce: While I agree that using citations from SubwayNut are not preferrable, for most stations, there is no other option. What other acceptable citations would there be? Other than getting access to station blueprints or the link, I can't see any.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Elevator/entrance project

@Epicgenius: Here is a presentation on the developer-funded improvements. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

@Kew Gardens 613: Thanks, this is very helpful. I haven't seen that video before. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Here is a VERY detailed document on the easement agreement with the developer. Maps for the layout/project begin on page 74. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 21:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)