This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
i believe that this content is purely informational and completely verifiable and does not solicit or promote a brand, product or service. it is consistent with the style, presentation and neutrality of articles on similar topics (please see south china morning post and hong kong standard). applying the standards of common sense, it's quite plain to see that the article has no pretenses. if anything, it suffers from a lack of detail, which may be updated when more verifiable information comes to hand. i sincerley hope you will reconsider the db-spam classification on this entry
re: lack of independent confirmation of notability: i believe that the publication qualifies as a notable source of news material by having been cited as the source of articles by notbale publications (hong kong standard and gma news tv, both of which are already cited in wikipedia). given. references to the aforementioned media entities have been added. therefore, may i request that you reconsider deletion of Filipino Globe for the reason given (lack of independent confirmation of notability). thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BuzzTian (talk • contribs) 12:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
