Talk:Filipinos (snack food)

controversy

should there be controversy of the name i mean they named a candy after an ethnic group. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.142.152.212 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 12 November 2006.

what evidence is there that it was named after an ethnic group? 71.135.161.158 03:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Filipino literally speaking can be anything named after someone named Felipe.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move. Duja► 09:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

---

Filipinos → Filipinos (snack food) — The term "Filipino" has been used to refer to Filipino people for many years, and the snack has existed for only several. This page existed as a disambiguation page before another editor moved the page to the snack food without a survey or discussion. I believe it's only fair to have this as a disambiguation page as I do not see how a group of snacks that have existed for several years are more notable than a group of people who have existed for much longer.--Folksong 09:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

• Strong support per nom. -Patstuart^talk|edits 03:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
• Support see my first set of comments on this talk page [1], although it may be more precise to use something like Filipinos (biscuit) or (brand) instead of the less specific (snack food) which could be confusing Zedla 12:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong support per nom. Lmblackjack21 18:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Support move to Filipinos (biscuit). Asterion^talk 14:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

Filipino people continues to be disambiguated at the top of the article, and while Filipino may have disambig to the snack, Filipinos never did before. I'm open to discussion about the controversy. Zedla 09:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 14:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

This is one of the reasons why the Filipino people has an ill will toward Spain and the Spanish people!

Better to idealize Portuguese customs than Spanish because Spanish customs are crude and barbaric! The Philippine government is a shame because it has no power to force it's dismay with the Spanish Racists! This is terrible article and very disturbing, Filipinos should distance it's civilization from Spain and Hispanic ways forever. No Por Idioma Espanol! Death to the Spanish Barbarians! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.68.114 (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Spain has racists as every country in the world. Filipinos literally means "from the Philipines" so you can say in Spanish "Coche filipino" meaning Philippine car without any negative connotation towards the Philipine Islands. Additionally it is impossible to erase more than 300 years of coexistence, and in my humble opinion, Spanish traces on Filipino culture are not only enriching but also beautifying for both cultures. Furthermore it is truly barbaric to demand the death of a nation only because you do not agree with the name of a snack, and without meaning offense, the history of the Philippines isn't much more enlightened and peaceful since 1898. Maybe instead of trying to change the rest of the world you could try to understand it.

PS: From what I could gather not all Filipinos feel the way you do so please restrain yourself of making such wild claims without any basis. Yours trully, A Spaniard --Escorxador (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Filipinos (snack food). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141019230020/http://www.unitedbiscuits.co.uk/80256C1A0047922E/vWeb/pcTSTT5EPFXB to http://www.unitedbiscuits.co.uk/80256C1A0047922E/vWeb/pcTSTT5EPFXB

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)