Talk:Filippo Drago (pharmacologist)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Tanonero in topic The article is neutral

The article is neutral

edit

The article reports objective information about the subject, all come from reliable sources, although there is a major contributor. There is no positive or either negative focus on the subject of the article.--95.250.103.1 (talk) 18:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC) The tag COI might be cancelled.Reply

I agree with 95.250.103.1. Please remove COI.--Meatable (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I agree with 95.250.103.1. I do not see any COI, therefore the warning Tag about COI should be removed. --Alberto castrogiovanni (talk) 08:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I am improving the format and checking all statements and sources, then I will remove the COI warning (which has not been put there by me). --Tanonero (msg) 02:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure if the most recent contributor is in a close connection to Drago (and I am not), but I don't see how the article does not represent a neutral standpoint given that all information is properly referenced and presented in a neutral tone. @Vituzzu: Would you mind pointing out what part(s) of the article are not neutral in your view? --Tanonero (msg) 11:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Chiarapchim surely is.
I removed some "Prof." but still it all sounds like a curriculum. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Vituzzu: It does sound a bit like a CV, but the tone is unbiased and and the text is properly referenced. If anything, we are perhaps showing the wrong disclaimer. --Tanonero (msg) 21:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I improved the article as much as I could and removed several sentences highlighting irrelevant career progression steps. I think it looks fine now. Please write here if you disagree, possibly pointing out the specific issues the article suffers from. --Tanonero (msg) 15:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply