Talk:Filo & Peri
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Filo & Peri article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Pictures
editAnyone have any gig pictures? We could use one. Belfunk (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
This Article Is Very Poor
editThis is a prime example of what we don't need in Wikipedia; an article that isn't as much informative as it is worshiping. This entire article needs to be rethought and rewritten.
Please keep the passion out of your descriptions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmaxen (talk • contribs) 05:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
This is a press-release re-written as a wiki article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.219.182 (talk) 07:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Nevermind. I am the author of the above comment, and I took it upon myself to un-public relations this article. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.219.182 (talk) 07:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Promotional
editThis article reads like a promotional press release, and as such does not take a neutral point of view. I suggest that it be either completely rewritten with proper sources, or deleted for lack of notability.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)