Talk:FinMkt/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article is far away from meeting the GA criteria. After David Gerard removed 'bad sources and puffery', the article is 190 words of text and tagged with {{refimprove}} and {{notability}}. It is far away from being a GA and I anticipate that it has little possibility of being improved to meet the criteria. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

• yeah, the initial assessment seemed to assume press release churnalism and cryptocurrency blogs were RSes, and that's not the case - David Gerard (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
• Since this is a stub now, I'd say it's better off delisted for the time being. JAGUAR 20:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

This GA review has been open for around nine days and seems to have no chance of being improved to meet the GA criteria any time soon. I am therefore demoting this article to stub-class. It can be re-nominated if users feel they have addressed the problems brought up in this reassessment. Best wishes, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)