Final Symphony has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 4, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Final Symphony/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
I should have this to you by tomorrow JAGUAR 17:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry this is taking so long, I'll do the review now JAGUAR 17:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Initial comments
edit- Just a personal preference but I would re-arrange the openeing sentence "Final Symphony was a symphonic concert first held in Wuppertal, Germany on May 11, 2013 at the Historische Stadthalle Wuppertal" so it reads Final Symphony was a symphonic concert first held at the Historische Stadthalle Wuppertal in Wuppertal, Germany on May 11, 2013, but it reads fine as it is
- "It was divided into three acts: a symphonic poem for VI, a piano concerto for X, and a symphony for VII" - are these in order?
- "with consultation by Final Fantasy composer Nobuo Uematsu" - from?
- Should there be a reception section under the Album section? If so, nothing on what critics thought of it was mentioned in the lead
- Some WP:OVERLINK in the Performances section, I would recommend cutting the countries' names as they were already linked in the lead
- Did the rephrase; as to the others: Yes, that's the order; changed to from; there is reception but since the album section is only 2 paragraphs I didn't want to cut it up into subsections, also, it is in the lead- I combine the reception of the concerts and albums since they're basically the same; and overlink had an exception that you repeat links from the lead. --PresN 18:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
References
editClose - promoted
editI thought about putting this on hold but the points above were only minor and it would take no effort to address them, so this article meets the GA criteria as it is. It's broad, well written and the references all check out. Well done! JAGUAR 18:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)