Talk:Financial Secrecy Index
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Financial Secrecy Index article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Financial Secrecy Index. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Financial Secrecy Index at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
No real explanation of what this is
editThis article is pretty much just a copy/paste of the list of information provided on the linked source page. It would help if there was an explanation of how these rankings are calculated, and whether or not it is considered to have credibility. Danrok (talk) 23:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- I think this has now been sufficiently upgraded to remove the concern. The method is explained in more detail and more references are given to its wide coverage in the media (and even in EU policy documents). thanks Britishfinance (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Please please please, stop calling the FSI a list of "tax havens"
editThe FSI is a list of financial secrecy jurisdictions - not tax havens. They are related but different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.33.206 (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Index country list
editThe country list and scores for this page has been removed, but I think the general trend on Wikipedia is that outside indexes and reports can be listed in full for examples Democracy index, OECD Better Life Index, Corruption Perceptions Index, Global Peace Index etc.
Do you think we should reconsider excluding the full list for the article? Bluealbion (talk) 01:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a place to re-publish content from other organizations. Just because you can find examples of poor-quality articles does not mean that this is part of Wikipedia policy. Please see: WP:NOT---Avatar317(talk) 05:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)