Talk:Fineness ratio
Latest comment: 8 years ago by TerrainAhead in topic Theory Behind "Ideal Fineness Ratio"
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fineness ratio. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fineness ratio at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Theory Behind "Ideal Fineness Ratio"
editI would like to see a section on why the ideal fineness ratio is 3 to 4. Thanks very much. =) 75.18.124.152 (talk) 07:38, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- All we need is references and it can be added. Do you know of any? - Ahunt (talk) 11:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- I might be a little bit late but I hope this helps. --TerrainAhead (talk) 13:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Good find on that ref. It is a good thing that the article doesn't say that the ideal fineness ratio is 3 to 4, as the ref makes it clear that the subject is more complex than that. Let me see if I can add a bit from the ref. - Ahunt (talk) 13:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Done - Ahunt (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
