Talk:Finnish coastal defence ship Ilmarinen

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Finnish coastal defence ship Ilmarinen → Ilmarinen (defence ship) — or some other name. According to wp:name174.3.107.176 (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

• Comment I think the current name complies with the systematic naming system come up with at WP:SHIPS ? 70.29.210.242 (talk) 05:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
• Comment "defence ship" is horrible, in the first place, it's a "coastal defence ship"... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 05:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
• I would Support Ilmarinen (ship). As it is the only ship currently on wikipedia, the 'defence' is unnecessary. --Labattblueboy (talk) 03:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Change position to oppose as per Benea.--Labattblueboy (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose. Current name complies with the guideline for English Wikipedia ship articles. See WP:NC-SHIP#Military_ships. See also WT:WikiProject_Ships#Naming_conventions. --J. Sketter (talk) 05:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC) (edit J. Sketter (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC))
• Oppose. Established naming conventions (For ships of navies or nations that don't have a standard ship prefix, name the article (Nationality) (type) (Name)), make the current title correct, hence German battleship Bismarck, [[Japanese aircraft carrier Sh�?kaku]], French frigate Méduse (1810), etc. Benea (talk) 10:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose. Per what Benea said. Also Väinämöinen (ship) should be changed back. --Laisak (talk) 21:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finnish coastal defence ship Ilmarinen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080412002907/http://users.tkk.fi/~jaromaa/Navygallery/index.html to http://users.tkk.fi/~jaromaa/Navygallery/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)