Talk:Fiordland National Park
 | This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
 |
|
Pictures
editGeez, we really need some photos for this beauty. Gonna have to make my way down there and get some pics next year when I'm in NZ if somebody hasn't already. —Christiaan 20:45, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
another road
editThre is another puplic road into Borland Pass, very nice and little used. Dushan Jugum
Helicopter Hunting in Fiordland
editif any one wants to take a look at Helicopter Hunting in Fiordland and help edit, upload pics ectra.. I'll try get some good pic's for the area. I have contacted a few older people with alot of local knowledge to see if they can share. Thorney 08:08, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Map
editI don't think the red area even remotely covers the area of the Park - it is huge! Can someone supply? GrahamBould 13:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Mining Threat section
editThis section is too brief to warrant it's own section and shows a biased viewpoint. Suggest it is edited significantly or deleted. Also needs citations badly.Duncanjmacleod (talk) 11:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Controversy over wapiti in Fiordland National Park
editThe article needs to cover the controversial issue of wapiti (or elk) in Fiordland National Park. See this recent article: [1]. The topic should probably also be covered in Te Wahipounamu because it may have implications for the World Heritage Status._Marshelec (talk) 05:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Overlap in content between Fiordland and Fiordland National Park
editThere is a significant overlap in content between the articles Fiordland (about the region) and Fiordland National Park. Plus there is also content in Fiordland that is needed in Fiordland National Park to make that article more complete. A high degree of overlap between these two articles seems undesirable because of the work required to maintain duplicated content. Is there a case for some rationalisation ? One possibility is to substantially trim the article Fiordland (about the region), to focus it on the boundary of the region, and relevant statistical content such as Demographics and economy. This would involve transferring and merging most of the content about history, geography and ecology with Fiordland National Park. Feedback at Talk:Fiordland please.__ Marshelec (talk) 21:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)