Talk:1st Army (Kingdom of Yugoslavia)
(Redirected from Talk:First Army (Yugoslavia))
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Peacemaker67 in topic Interwikis, title
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1st Army (Kingdom of Yugoslavia) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | 1st Army (Kingdom of Yugoslavia) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 21, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interwikis, title
editThe interwiki links are currently wrong, because bs, sh and sl wiki refer to the First army of Yugoslav Partisans, formed 1 January 1945, along with 2nd, 3rd and 4th. Not sure how long they lasted, as all the articles in e.g. sh:Kategorija:Armije_NOVJ end up in May 1945, as well as in the source they're based on. That sort of opens the issue of naming of articles in this group, as "Yugoslavia" is kind of ambiguous. Technically, the full disambiguator would be (Kingdom of Yugoslavia), but I'm not sure it's necessary, as we don't have these articles now and it's questionable when we are going to. In any case, at least the interwikis should be unchained. No such user (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed the interwikis, the rest are the right ones I think. Yep, I've been thinking about that, perhaps in the short-term we assume the 1945 ones will go at Foost Army (Yugoslav Partisans)? Thoughts? Peacemaker67 (send... over) 14:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)