Talk:First Battle of Newbury/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jim Sweeney in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 15:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  1. Day, Jon (2007). Gloucester & Newbury 1643: The Turning Point of the Civil War the ISBN is incorrect
  2. Worden, Blair (2009). The English Civil Wars, 1640-1660. Phoenix Sme with this one the ISBN needs checking
  3. Not a requirement for GA if if going any further the cities of publication needs adding to the books.
  4. Some links need disambiguating River Avon, Severn Valley, Upton

A good read just some minor points that keep if from GA well done. Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Passed GA

Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply