This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editi heard that fish has 3-4 sec memory power is it true???????????
Bias
editThis article appears biased. Generally most fish are not considered to be intelligent (There are some some species of fish that displays more intelligent behavior), because they lack a cerebral cortex. The article needs to be more balanced. 83.108.108.244 (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I agree. This seems to be more of a Guinness Book of Records for fish intelligence, not actually explaining the intelligence of fish. It would be like talking about human speed by discussing Mr. Bolt, rather than me. Me? Zombies would get me. 12.234.128.60 (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Recent edits
editTwo sections, "Play" and "Storage" have been added. These 2 behaviours are highly suspect as indicators of intelligence - the subject matter of this article. Did the authors of the research make this link to intelligence, otherwise this might be a case of WP:OR? I add that the edit was in good faith and I would hate to discourage the editor from contributing.__DrChrissy (talk) 15:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Brain section
editI believe the brain section needs some careful editing and only the smallest of mentions in the lede. This is because the evidence for brain characteristics and intelligence is far from conclusive. "People have long been tempted to link brain size and cognition. The intuitive notion that a “big brain” means “more intelligent” was first threatened some time ago, when we discovered animals with larger brains than ours: elephants and whales. Sure as we were of humankind’s superior intelligence, we still felt the need to prevail, so we gamely parried: Perhaps it is the brain size relative to body size that makes our brains the biggest. Though humans come out well there, too, this measure is biased toward birds and other small animals that have relatively large brains for their bodies. After more deliberation, scientists finally offered up the so-called “encephalization quotient”: brain size relative to the expected brain size in related taxa. On top: humans. Phew.[1] published in December 2013.__DrChrissy (talk) 15:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fish intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5hn2YJET6?url=http://juls.sa.utoronto.ca/Issues/JULS-Vol2Iss1/JULS-Vol2Iss1-Review3.pdf to http://juls.sa.utoronto.ca/Issues/JULS-Vol2Iss1/JULS-Vol2Iss1-Review3.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/culumbrown/BrownLalandFAF2003.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/culumbrown/LalandBrownKrauseFAF2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)