Talk:Fitzwilliam

Requested move 18 July 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) MOVED consensus is there is no primary topic. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

---

• Fitzwilliam (disambiguation) → Fitzwilliam
• Fitzwilliam → Fitzwilliam (surname)

– No PT per views, the surname article has 327 views while Fitzwilliam, West Yorkshire has 747, Fitzwilliam, New Hampshire has 326 and Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge has 2,567. Move the surname article to Fitzwilliam (surname). Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). DannyS712 (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale: this isn't a technical request - it involves assessing that there is no primary topic. I've opened an RM and tagged the surname page so that this can be discussed. --DannyS712 (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

• Support per nom - no clear primary topic between the name and the places. Move disambiguation page to basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:13, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support per nom. No primarytopic. Dicklyon (talk) 04:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
• I'm not sure why this was contested? Moves of PTs can be done without discussion and the page views evidence clearly shows no PT, Gentre for example was moved. I'd also point out the on Google the collage dominates and that this was originally about the English village, then became a DAB page, then the DAB was spit to Fitzwilliam (disambiguation) in 2017 and although its been stable like that for over 2 years I see no evidence of a primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2019 (UTC)