Talk:Five Ponds Wilderness Area

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Dubious claim

edit

"This is one of the few locations in the northeastern United States where stands of virgin timber can be found"

False. There are plenty of virgin tracts of timber in the two large wilderness areas in the Catskills alone, as Michael Kudish's book can tell you; I'm sure there are stands in northern New England too. Did the article mean something else? I know I've heard it's one of the largest virgin timber stands in the country ... maybe that's what you meant? Can you provide some source for what you'ren talking about? Daniel Case 03:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Two things, this comes from the State Land Master Plan so I'm hesitant to doubt the claim outright. Second, I think there's a distinction between virgin and old-growth forest. New York has a lot of old growth forests, but nearly all of them were logged in the past. FPWA is often described as the largest remaining stand of forest that was never logged in human history. [1] Ari 11:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't always trust the APA to get these things right. They (and DEC for that matter) have made mistakes in other planning documents.

There are large tracts in the interior of, say, the Slide Mountain Wilderness Area that Kudish says show no evidence of logging (largely because they were so remote). I think what they meant here is that it's the largest stand of loggable timber (as in, something that could make money even today) that has never been cut. Let's go with "largest" instead of "only". Daniel Case 13:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

That works for me. Ari Epstein 19:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Five Ponds Wilderness Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply