Talk:Five of Wands

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

NPOV

edit

Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

copy and paste

edit

A large part of this article appears to be copied from http://www.learntarot.com.

I'm not sure of current procedure, but I will remove the section if it is not rewritten unless someone better versed than I am can show me an alternative. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge to

edit

I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the wands suit would be better placed in Suit of wands with this page changed to a redirectTetron76 (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Five of Wands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply