Talk:Flame (color)

Redirect

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge into Scarlet (color)#Flame. Slon02 (talk) 01:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

---

As we recently saw at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thistle (color), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CG Red and similar recent AfD's, many of these color stubs aren't notable enough to have their own articles, and should instead be redirected/merged into larger articles. I propose redirecting this article to Scarlet (color)#Flame, where it already exists with almost all of the content. Before redirecting, we could save the sourced bit about the first recorded use of flame as a color name and put it into that section. However, I don't think that this color name is notable enough for its own article, and propose that it be redirected to a larger list of similar colors.--Slon02 (talk) 15:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

• I have no objection whatsoever if you want to merge this color into the article into Scarlet (color). Keraunos (talk) 23:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Please be sure to import the image of burning flames. You might want to make the image a little smaller. Keraunos (talk) 23:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

• Note: There is a discussion being held here about whether to merge minor colors into articles on the physical objects that they represent or into color-list articles.--Slon02 (talk) 22:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.