Talk:Flekkefjord Station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAreview.Pyrotec (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Initial questions

• Paul Armin Due - "The station building was drawn by...", I think in English a better word would be "The station building was designed by...", is this the intended meaning?

• Yes, that would be the intention. I am sorry, another Norwengish term (in Norwegian, architects draw houses, and my dictionary did not mention the term). Thankfully, there are people who can find my systematical errors and teach me how to become a better writer.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive article covering not only the station and its useage, but also the changes in the "station's fortune" from intended through-station to terminus-branch-station.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   The inclusion of more English-language Refs would be good.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

A Good Article. Congratulations, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for another review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 23:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)