Talk:Float (project management)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I'm marking this as a stub, not just because it lacks content, but also because it even more severely lacks textual content. Much of the content is one big image, and I'm sure the information could be presented in textual form. To get as much information as possible into a textual form would be sensible from an accessibility POV. -- Smjg 02:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


The picture seems to be incorrect. The free and total float of H are higher, because there is no reason why H would only start so many days after G has been completed (assuming no delay for G). If there had been a line from C to H it would have been correct.131.155.199.81 08:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

A definition please

edit

As someone who has come to this site wanting to know how to work out slack/float, I must say it has told me nothing of use. why not include an equation such as float = LS - ES? The diagram (which someone has suggested is incorrect any way) includes no information on ES, EF duration, etc. so it is not even possible to extrapolate how these figures are arrived at. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brentonjames (talkcontribs) 01:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please remove

edit

"Slack/Float" is basically an inherent feature of individual project/task/milestone scheduling.

This has come up over at the OOPM (openoffice.org) qa feature request list, as well. However, given either Pert or other methodologies, this seems to be an inherent feature of those methodologies.

To be precise, I would call this FUD, or a red herring, so to say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.54.97.90 (talk) 19:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Float (project management). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply