Talk:Flora of Colombia

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Assessment

edit

This article contains very little prose, including the lead. It's mostly a list, with a huge amount of gallery space. I wouldn't rate it as B myself. If it is going to remain as listy as this it might be better to rename it list of plants in Columbia. It should also probably just link to a Commons category and have a few pictures here and there. It's no worse than most other 'flora of' or 'biodiversity of' articles, but it's not a B class by my judgement. Richard001 03:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I think this should be re-assessed as start class. It still has several major problems. Aero on 01:58:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
edit

Is this not excessive at all? I mean, it is very long, and overwhelming.... Aero 04:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, as I suggested above. Richard001 06:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flora of Colombia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply