Talk:Flora of the Australian Capital Territory

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Canberra / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Flora of the Australian Capital Territory is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

I tried to clean this up. Hopefully things are easier to read (was quite long). This is the first time I've tried this. If there's obvious ways that I could have done it better, please drop me a line User_talk:Samma3l

its looking a lot better. This page was a work in progress, with a lot more to add about vascular plants, mosses, ferns, and fungi. The lichens as a list may be all you need to know! GB 13:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wow! so many lichens.. you must know a lot about lichens Alexander110 04:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't know much, but the Botanic gardens has an online list that I used. Other plant lists were not so accessible. SHould this be list class, the intention was an article rather than a list! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

ACT Trees discussion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added a list of trees found in the ACT. However, it's actually what has been approved by the government not what is exactly found in the ACT. However, in the source it does discuss where each tree may be found in the ACT so it is therefore implied that these are all currently in the ACT.

As such, I hope adding this to the wiki is appropriate. If anyone disagrees, please respond to this talk post before modifying it/removing it. Thanks Ustkako (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic