Talk:Florida's 1st congressional district

POV?

This article sounds like it was written by someone who doesn't think Democrats exist in NW Florida, and that Eglin Air Force Base is the only military installation in the district. I've tried to correct some of that, and expand the article a little.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Disavian (talk • contribs) 12:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC-5)

"Redneck Riviera?" Really?

Isn't this nickname at least petty? First, I can tell you personally that people who live in the area do not call it that. Second, c'mon, class it up. Third, and most importantly, Florida is a transient state. Tremendous numbers of people who live here were not born in the state. It would be far more accurate to call Alabamians "rednecks" and to call Floridians "New Yorkers and Cubans." Jessemckay (talk) 02:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Lack of Info

Never really does this before, but as I am a native of the district, I felt like I had to point some things out. First, it is pretty obvious, if you know the area, that the article was written by someone living in Okaloosa County. There is a strong Okaloosa bias in the article. Second, it was not written by a native. "The Emerald Coast" is not an "affectionate local name for the Gulf Coast beaches of Florida's Panhandle, from Pensacola east to Destin." It is a marketing term, like many other before it, and a true native would know that. I would like the see really registration numbers broken down by party and county. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.89.123.215 (talk) 06:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Expansion

Mentions military presence and tourism but doesn't explain how that impacts the politics, which is the topic of the article, in this part of Florida. RJFJR (talk) 20:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florida's 1st congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Matt Gaetz Allegations

The Gaetz's allegation should not be covered in this article, the article is about who rep the district, Gaetz's allegations are being covered in his article GameEnd (talk) 18:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

No The allegations are relevant. 2605:B100:D3C:1431:2016:95EB:E26B:BC49 (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• I revdel'd the challenged content and protected the page. Please establish consensus to add back. DISCLAIMER: I hate Gaetz's guts. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

• I've seen the related section on Matt Gaetz. The content there is nothing like the revdel'd content here. It's neutral an not undue. To be clear, not opposed to adding neutral, non salacious, non inflammatory content. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Requesting temporary lock

Page is being vandalized and re-vandalized after being fixed. I am requesting a temporary lock on the page to fix this vandalism. Taco098541 (talk) 18:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)