Talk:Flower (video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

I originally started to add my review in the template as I usually do, but I realised there wasn't much point- there were a few very minor changes that I was willing to make myself, and everything else was already of a very high quality. As such, I'm willing to pass this straight off the bat- you should feel honoured, it's the first time I've done that! The article is very well written, very well researched, well sourced to great sources and appropriately illustrated. There are no issues with neutrality or stability. As such, I will simply offer some suggestions for improvements to make before taking this to FAC (which I don't think would be too hard, as the article is already in great shape)-

• I feel more could be said about the music- it's mentioned everywhere, but never really expanded upon. Perhaps it even deserves its own section. If such a section was created and expanded to its full potential, a music sample would also be a great addition.
• Make sure everything said in the gameplay section (and, if possible, the brief section on the plot) is attributed to sources. I'm willing to ignore the possibility that there's some information in there not attributed to any source (I didn't check fully) for the sake of a GA review. If there isn't any, ignore this.
• The fair use rationales could do with a tightening- the use of the images is legit, but do your best to make the rationales pretty water-tight
• Check the categories for redundant categories that are redundant. I'm not a PS3 person, and I'm a little tired, so I haven't done that.
• Confirm that GameSetWatch is definitely a reliable source. Again, I'm willing to skip over that point for now- even if it isn't, the rest of the article makes up for it.
• Expand with anything you can find- FAC reviewers may be a little worried by the length.

Feel free to contact me if this is taken to FAC, and I'll be happy to have another look through it. J Milburn (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Can I ask how there can be a disscusion for an article that doesn't exist? Mysteryman19 (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

This review page is a sub-page of Talk:Flower (video game), and the article can be found at Flower (video game). The red-link at the top of this page is a technical issue relating to subpages, which are not supposed to be used in article space, but can be used in other WP:Namespaces. Courcelles (talk) 01:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)