Talk:Floyd Henry Allport

Floyd Henry Allport was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 20, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is shady to call Floyd Allport, who I've never heard of until today, the founder of social psychology as a scientific discipline. At least say that there may be other contenders for that title (Kurt Lewin, Gordon Allport, etc). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.226.164.168 (talk) 12:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Floyd Henry Allport/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 02:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry to say I have to speedy fail this article as an egregious copyright violation; almost all the text appears to come from [1]. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic