Talk:Fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could someone define all the variables in the second equation in the "Fluorescence lifetimes" section, please.

It would make it much more helpful to those who are new to the topic. Thanks!

-- What about w? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.237.9 (talk) 09:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

speed

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

How long does it take to capture an image, and what does the time depend on ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

FLIM protocol suggests 60 sec and vary to get about 10^5 photons (per pixel ?) - Rod57 (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120909110031/http://loci.wisc.edu/biophotonics/fluorescence-excited-state-lifetime-imaging to http://loci.wisc.edu/biophotonics/fluorescence-excited-state-lifetime-imaging/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fluorescence lifetimes wrong

I'm not an expert in this stuff, but I do know my statistical physics. The single exponential decay would be a limiting case only. - If there are parallel observable decays, you would get a sum of exponentials. - If there are serial decays, you can get differences of exponentials (depends on which part of the pathways is fluorescent).

So the statement in this section seems wrong, and should be corrected, or conditions for this approximation mentioned.

Add topic