Talk:Flux qubit

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lucieamidon, Gblair13. Peer reviewers: NJSavino, MhinkleTULANE.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Talk

link to Jena does not work.

Questions

Is the minimum flux quanta Phi_zero when there is a single cooper pair traveling around the qubit?

It seems not: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8483 says there are more than 10^7 electrons moving collectively.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.250.252.133 (talk) 15:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 

If the wavefunction has 2*pi phase shift around the qubit (for a single flux quanta), and the probability of locating the cooper pair is the square of the wavefunction, does that mean the cooper pair are more likely to be found in two lobes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.250.252.133 (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Flux qubit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070214111933/http://www.ipht-jena.de:80/BEREICH_1/abt13_cryo_electronics/application-data/computing.php to http://www.ipht-jena.de/BEREICH_1/abt13_cryo_electronics/application-data/computing.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I added a link to superconducting quantum computing

Such a link was missing, so I added it on the first line. Tal Mor (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flux qubit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20080301104624/http://qt.tn.tudelft.nl/research/fluxqubit/ to http://qt.tn.tudelft.nl/research/fluxqubit/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)