Talk:Focke-Wulf Ta 283
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 15 February 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Focke-Wulf Ta 283 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 15 February 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. No prospect of consensus to move. I also note that this and similar nominations based on one particular reference, that of Dan Sharp, seem to have no basis according to our article naming policy. Andrewa (talk) 08:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Focke-Wulf Ta 283 → Focke-Wulf Strahlrohrjäger – Dan Sharp's book Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe: Jet Fighters 1939-1945 notes that the designation "Ta 283" cited for the Focke-Wulf Strahlrohrjäger is a fictitious designation invented by aviation historians in the post-WW2 period derived from drawing Nr. 283 for the Strahlrohrjäger. Thus, the Strahlrohrjäger never received an RLM designation. Convariety (talk) 03:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Ta 283 seems to be the WP:COMMONNAME in reliable, English-language sources. Sharp's book seems to be the only one that uses the proposed name. (t · c) buidhe 04:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.