Talk:Folkewall

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 91.164.158.11 in topic Secondary sources and notoriety

Sources needed

edit

This article really needs reliable secondary sources, independent of the subject, to establish notability.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Confusing

edit

It says human waste must not be included, yet talks about source separating toilets being needed. Puzzling. 86.29.7.158 (talk) 21:40, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Secondary sources and notoriety

edit

study in Environmental Engineering, Spring 2013.

They use the folkewall in their references

91.164.158.11 (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copy of message left on Andyjsmith talk page

edit
Deletion of Folkewall

Hello there. Answer to your "The only references to "folkewall" I can find on the web are to wikis and self published site. Nothing that indicates notability". Please see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Folkewall#Secondary_sources_and_notoriety the result of an ultraquick search I've done. Gives a list of articles (some academics) & pages that talk about the folkewall and/or use it as one of their references. I agree that the page could be improved, and yes the website holon.se has disappeared as such. That's no good reason for deleting the page. Tha,k you for your attention. 91.164.158.11 (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply