Talk:Font hinting

Typography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Computer graphics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What is hinting?

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This piece doesn't clearly say what hinting is, only what it does and why it is used. 203.33.3.12 00:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I edited the article so that it's a little more clear what hinting is. The links to Microsoft's typography pages provide helpful visuals, but since they aren't free, I haven't included them. —Down10 ^TACO 02:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Comment

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Human Readers? As opposed to......? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.207.3 (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

OCR and other machine reading algorithms. Svyatoslav (talk) 04:56, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

PostScript

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article doesn't mention PostScript fonts, but talks as if font hinting is a feature only found in TrueType fonts. AFAIK this is wrong.--Oneiros (talk) 17:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oo, very wrong. —Tamfang (talk) 03:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Antialiasing

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think the example illustration would be much clearer if it weren't also antialiased. i.e. show non-antialiased/non-hinted vs non-antialiased/hinted. It's also worth going through the 4 permutations (on a small display):

non-antialiased, non-hinted → usually horrible, looks "spidery" (except for bitmap fonts at native resolution)
antialiased, non-hinted → marginal improvement on antialiased/non-hinted.
non-antialiased, hinted → very sharp and clear, but unfaithful to the glyph outlines. Some people (including myself) find this most readable.
antialiased, hinted → clear and smooth. Most people prefer this look, but some find it makes the fonts look blurry and hard to focus on, resulting in eye-strain.
subpixel-rendering increases smoothness (making hinting less necessary), but adds colour-fringing, which some viewers dislike.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.171.29 (talk) 23:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes exactly. As the previous section also says, this article seems to only consider TrueType hinting without antialiasing. The situation is confused by the articles Subpixel rendering and especially Font rasterization. Shreevatsa (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic