Talk:Foo Fighters (album)/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Noleander in topic Comments
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Noleander (talk · contribs) 12:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I can do this review, pending consent of nominator. --Noleander (talk) 12:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Comments
edit- word "frontman" - may need explanation for readers not familiar with the term.
- "The album did receive minor criticism .." -> "The album received ..."
- Foo Fighters navbox at bottom of article: is there a way to have it expanded (not collapsed) by default, so novice readers can see the whole thing without clicking?
- "... but once Petty heard about the Foo Fighters, he instead stimulated Grohl to move on with this solo project." - "Stimulated" is not the right word. Maybe "encouraged"
- "at Capitol's insistence photos of the entire lineup .." - what lineup? the producers? Or the band that Grohl assembled after the album was finished?
--Noleander (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Fixed those (except the template, there's a way to do it but I don't know if it's required...). igordebraga ≠ 01:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
More comments
edit- Very good. I am passing this. A couple of afterthoughts:
- There is no "See also" section: are there no related articles that are not yet linked? If not, no need for such section.
- There is no "references/bibliography" section that list books on the topic. Are there any books that focus the band? If not, no need for such section. --Noleander (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Tick list
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail: