Talk:Food Quality Protection Act

Did you know

Nice work on this so far, Clairestum. It looks like (excluding the FQPA requirements at the bottom of the article) you've expanded it to a little over 5 times its original size since October 12, which would make it eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" blurb. If you do want to nominate it, you'll have to act quickly, though; there's a five-day eligibility window since the expansion started. See the instructions I left for Kcahlber. --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 15:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

FQPA section

Hey. I saw your number format in the FQPA section of your article and thought it looked very neat. I'm actually struggling between keeping my participants and roles in either paragraph format or bullet points but I think number format would be much better. Good work on the article by the way. (User talk:SoAuthentic )

Great work on the article so far. This section could be expanded with mor information about each of thew requirements, and how they work. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Legislation infobox

I think this article would benefit from the addition of a legislative infobox (Which is Template:Infobox U.S. legislation). You can see an example of a good entry here - Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Thoughts? Remember (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Thanks for the link and suggestion. I can work on getting all the fields filled out and get it live. Question: does the information within the template need to be sourced? I noticed the example gives a link to the library of congress but does not give a source for all the info. Just considered common knowledge? Clairestum (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

There is usually not references in the infoboxes themselves but a link to the library of congress would be very useful. I added a draft of the infobox below that we can work on before it goes live. Remember (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I removed the draft infobox since there is no need for it now. Remember (talk) 15:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Further sources

If anyone wants to expand further...here are some more sources:

• Impacts of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 on Future Pesticide Use— Does Anyone Have a Crystal Ball?
• Pesticide Residue Regulation: Analysis of Food Quality Protection Act Implementation, CRS Report
• The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996: By Removing Chemical Irritants From Our Environment Will It Generate Trade Irritants to Replace Them?, William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review
• The Food Quality Protection Act and California Agriculture
• PESTICIDE LEGISLATION: FOOD QUALITY PROTECTION ACT OF 1996, CRS Report
• Measuring the Impact of the Food Quality Protection Act: Challenges and Opportunities, Inspector General
• The 1996 Food Quality Protection Act—An Evolution or a Revolution for Toxicology and Risk Assessment
• Pesticide Science Policy; Notice of Withdrawal

Smallman12q (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

food quality

food should be natural — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.168.29 (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Food Quality Protection Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814000359/http://entweb.clemson.edu/pesticid/Document/FQPA/FQPAinf2.htm to http://entweb.clemson.edu/pesticid/Document/FQPA/FQPAinf2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)