Talk:Foot-in-the-door technique/Archives/2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Foot-in-the-door technique. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Acronym
I'm pretty sure the acronym should read FITD and am changing it accordingly. Dblanchar (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Templates
I definitely do not think this should be merged into the compliance article. It is a huge area of research in the persuasion field. I've added several sources, additional examples of experiments, and beefed it up somewhat. I've taken the liberty of removing the templates as they no longer seem relevant. Please let me know if anyone has any objections. Thanks, Renee (talk) 23:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Examples
Seriously, the examples section doesn't seem right. It shows things that people sometimes do, but it doesn't explain them. No sources. I think if no sources can be added and no REAL expert can explain them, they ought to be removed.
-- 79.145.57.41 (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- The point of an examples section is to provide (potential) examples of usage, and the litmus test for citation is whether the material is challenged or likely to be challenged—uncontroversial information does not require a citation. Unless you believe these examples are controversial, there's no reason to remove them. – 74 14:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
The examples section should contain pertinent examples of the FITD technique not opinions about its use in decreasing world usage of materials. While this is a valid point, it is not scholarly in nature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.162.79.59 (talk) 04:12, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
googlenotebook/faq
What kind of a smart person linked to google.com/intl/uk/googlenotebook/faq.html in "Examples"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.221.56.166 (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)