Talk:Forces Command (Australia)

Move to Forces Command

Suggest moving page to Forces Command - Forces Command (Australia) . It already exists. Moving information from this page. Put in a redirect on this page.

Similar to Special Operations Command - Special Operations Command

• Intro on the Command
• Structure
• Commander Forces Command (COMD FORCOMD) --Melbguy05 (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Given that this article covers more than just the commanders this proposal has merit to me. I'd support doing this unless anyone has any valid arguments against (sorry its early and I'm not thinking straight - situation normal some might say). Anotherclown (talk) 21:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I created the page Forces Command Forces Command (Australia). It is basic. No re directs yet. This page is still up obviously. --Melbguy05 (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

No worries, probably no need for both articles though. Is there consensus to redirect this one (i.e. Commander Forces Command (Australia)) to the new one (i.e. Forces Command (Australia)? I've no issue with that if there is. Ping @AustralianRupert: and @Nick-D: - what do you guys think? Anotherclown (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

G'day, yes I agree, no need for both articles. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

When I say created Forces Command (Australia). It was created on 27 December 2012. It was then a redirect to Commander Forces Command (Australia). I've put some info on it. New to Wikipedia. I've moved articles to create a new page. Not sure what to do to make it one article. If it is just putting in a redirect. --Melbguy05 (talk) 08:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

G'day, the best thing probably would have been to move this one over the redirect, but given that it now has content it is a bit trickier. Question: in creating the content for the Forces Command (Australia) article, did you write it completely yourself, or copy some of this article? If the former, this one can just be redirected, if the later, some sort of histmerge is probably required, but that will be a tad trickier than usual (I'm fairly sure I can achieve it, but it will require a bit of research on my part as I'm still new to the histmerge tool. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

G'day, I copied the content from this page. It wouldn't let me do a move because of the existing page. Made that a redirect again. I've put in a ( db-move| page to be moved here | reason for move ) technical request after I did some reading on moving. --Melbguy05 (talk) 13:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Melbguy05: Ok, I've performed the move/merge. Hopefully I didn't muck anything up. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I've been off net a bit due old man's disease so I appreciate this being followed through. Anotherclown (talk) 22:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Forces Command (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160705212417/http://www.army.gov.au/~/media/Army/Our%20future/About/Army%20101%20Brief%20Ver%207%20-%20Modernising%20from%20Beersheba%20and%20Beyond%20v4.pdf to http://www.army.gov.au/~/media/Army/Our%20future/About/Army%20101%20Brief%20Ver%207%20-%20Modernising%20from%20Beersheba%20and%20Beyond%20v4.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.army.gov.au/docs/Adaptive_Army_Public_Info_Paper.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)