Talk:Fordham Graduate School of Business
 | The contents of the Fordham Graduate School of Business page were merged into Gabelli School of Business on 20 August 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Justifiability of proposed speedy delete
editHello. My page (a work in progress to be sure) is up for speedy deletion, but I am trying to create a page about Fordham University Graduate School of Business. So far there is no promoting or advertising going on, and I would like to know why it was marked. I have two paragraphs and already have three legitimate reference. Everything was fine until I put in a subheading of "Statistics and Ranking" that would highlight the school's standing in national publications (with references). But since this potential deletion, I am going to stop working on the page until I hear more. Please let me know if I can continue to work on this page to create a legitimate and fact-based page on the school. If you still feel that this is infringement on Wiki's rules, please let me know why.
Many thanks, Fordcam (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- I want to echo the article's creator in his bewilderment as to why this article was tagged for speedy deletion. First of all, there is clear consensus that colleges and universities are inherently notable, regardless of content. This article made clear claims of notability and provided appropriate sources as it existed when the speedy tag was applied 14 minutes after its creation. While I admire the zeal with which some new page patrollers seek to stamp out problem articles, this does not make every single article that whizzes by a cockroach that needs to be stamped on, and not the clearly obvious article-in-formation that this article is. There is something wrong here and it needs to be stopped. Alansohn (talk) 21:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Fordham University mascot.gif
edit
The image Image:Fordham University mascot.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 | This article was nominated for merging with Gabelli School of Business on 12 March 2015. The result of the discussion was uncontested merge. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fordham Graduate School of Business. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916145214/http://www.businessweek.com:80/bschools/rankings to http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/rankings/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916145214/http://www.businessweek.com:80/bschools/rankings to http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/rankings/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)