Talk:Foreign Policy Association
Latest comment: 6 years ago by DuncanHill in topic "impartial"
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Undid Vandalism by 98.14.136.45
edit- The user at 98.14.136.45 contributed editing to this article by deleting the list of Board of Director members that someone had contributed... I think the governance lists of powerful and influential organizations are very important sources of information about who makes decisions on behalf of these organizations and may be indicative of why the organization makes those decisions to begin with... I regard what the "editor" did in this regard as vandalism. They did not explain at all why they did what they did nor replace the information with more cogent information - hence I think the removal of information for no reason is vandalism. If anything the section needs better organization and presentation - but I don't think content should be deleted....Stevenmitchell (talk) 05:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
refugee SOS
editBeacause of political and heatlthy bothering and job by the government I want to get refuge and health helping. Abdul Esmaili (talk) 18:05, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
"impartial"
edit"The Great Decisions briefing book features impartial, thought-provoking analyses on eight issues of concern to U.S. policymakers today."
Who says? ---Dagme (talk) 09:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- I've trimmed some of the promotional language like that. Article still needs work. DuncanHill (talk) 10:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)