Wikipedia

Talk:Foreign hostages in Iraq

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 94.254.152.192 in topic Extremely out of date
Learn more about this page

Google help

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page could really benefit from a couple of us making a point to google some names that are currently unresolved, and find out what happened to them. Sherurcij 14:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Some of the hostages' fates are unknown. The captors simply showed one video and that's it. They never showed an update video to reveal what the hell happened to them. Other kidnapping victims just simply disappeared with no hostage video at all. George Ramos

The ransom amounts aren't clear. I recall that some of the ransom demands were for US dollars, some demands were for gold. It isn't made clear which was which in this reportage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.199.196 (talk) 19:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Colorizing vs tagging

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Instead of colorizing this page needs tags instead it will make the page easier to read and more organized.

(Killed)
(Released) for those released by the kidnappers
(Freed) for those released by police or military forces
(Unknown) Status unknown

The tags could be colorized but colorizing the entire text is excessive. SusanLarson 20:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


I agree we need to distinguish those freed by police/military forces, though I'd simply suggest a third colour. This isn't an article, it's a listing, which I think is an important distinction to make. Thus colourising the entries, like listing whether a country is a member of the coalition, makes it much easier to get a clear indication of the context. (One can look at Canada, see it's not a member of the coalition, but even only paying brief attention, sees that it has had hostages killed). So ideally it seems, list the killed in red, the freed in green, and the rescued in orange or something. Very few people will read the entire list, and even fewer will make little notes on a piece of paper to get a fair idea of what percentage are killed/freed/rescued, so it's important that we make a list like this one as visual as possible Sherurcij (talk) (bounties) 20:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


The goal is for this to be easy to read not colorful please limit the excessive use of colors in this page. It's hard on the eyes and for the colorblind can be hard or impossible to read. Thank you SusanLarson 20:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
For the few colourblind people, I'm certain they have their browsers set up to ignore colour tag text anyways, so they'd be seeing it in b/w just like any other website. As I explained, as a list of a highly debated nature, it's important that the list be not only easy to read, but easy to interpret. Part of that means admitting that most people aren't going to read 200 entries, they will skim over it...so we should leave them an NPOV way of taking in the information. You could use bold versus italic theoretically, but that would be worse I think. I acknowledge this isn't a perfect system, but it's the best possible within the WP framework. Sherurcij (talk) (bounties) 20:47, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Please see Manual of style: formatting issues section specifically 

Formatting issues such as font size, blank space and color  are issues for the 
Wikipedia site-wide style sheet and should  not be dealt with in articles except
in special cases. If you absolutely must specify a font size, use a relative 
size i.e.  font-size: 80%; not an absolute size, for example, font-size: 4pt.
Color coding of information should not be done, but if necessary, try to 
choose colors that are unambiguous when viewed by a person with color blindness. 
In general, this means that red and green should not both be used. Viewing 
the page with Vischeck can help with deciding if the colors  should be altered.
(http://www.vischeck.com/vischeck/vischeckURL.php)

Thank you :) SusanLarson 21:03, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hrm, I'd still argue that it doesn't want 'information', meaning articles (as opposed to lists) sorted by colour, but I certainly admit you're right about the red and green...do you have other suggestions for colours that would be more visually adept? Sherurcij (talk) (bounties) 21:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Not for colors however I did reformat the page perhaps that will suit both of our tastes :) SusanLarson 23:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
retouched the TOC, I assume this is an improvement still? Sherurcij (talk) (bounties) 21:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

References/names

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I've gone through with google and tried to find references, and actual names (instead of "A Swiss couple" or "A truck driver") wherever possibile, and would just like to remind/encourage others to do the same. Sherurcij (talk) (bounties) 21:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Mr. Micheal Chand, kidnapped 17 August 2007, Amarah Iraq —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.130.104 (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I suggest that the term mercenary be used, where appropriate, instead of the euphemism "Security contractor".203.184.41.226 (talk) 04:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Eugene Armstrong merge

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Eugene Armstrong isn't going anywhere as an article, and it's now failed AfD twice even though it's an obvious WP:COATRACK. I think the details of the execution should be merged here and then the article redirected. As-is, we're pretending that an article which contains almost no information barring the execution is a biography. Chris Cunningham (talk) 17:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

as it has been kept twice on afd there is noconsensus that it is not a suitable article by itself. DGG (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge - No sources. Subject is known for one event which is an encyclopedic topic. I'm going back right now to remove some of the speculation/OR/POV and see what's left. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Split hostages held or executed in Syria

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since there's now been two, and soon probably three hostages captured, held, and executed in Syria by ISIS I think a new page similar to this page should be created for those individuals called Foreign hostages in Syria. ~Technophant (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Foreign hostages in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Foreign hostages in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foreign hostages in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Foreign hostages in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Extremely out of date

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The updating ceased over a decade ago. There have been, of course, others since then. Such as John Cantlie, whose article linked here in "see also" only to have no trace of him here. 94.254.152.192 (talk) 10:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foreign_hostages_in_Iraq&oldid=1252392995"