Talk:Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Koavf in topic Removing substantial sourced claims

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 65 external links on Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removing substantial sourced claims

edit

User:Underdwarf58 Why did you do this? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 01:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Because the other foreign relations pages are like that too. Look at Palestine for example. Previously it had a way bigger list with countries that recognize Palestinian statehood and if either they maintain relations with it or not. But a few days ago, User:Semsûrî decided to simplify the list into the format used in the other pages. Because of this, I decided to the same thing for the SADR. Underdwarf58 (talk) 03:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
This article is not required to look like that one. Why not change that article to look like this one? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 05:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Look, I appreciate your perspective. The reason why I chose to simplify the list on the 'Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic' page is in order to align it with the formatting used in other 'Bilateral relations' pages for consistency and also because it is the last state to have that list. However, I understand that you have a different opinion on this matter.
Instead of changing the other article to match the same style, I believe it would be more effective to have a consistent format across all 'Bilateral relations' pages. This would ensure that readers have a cohesive experience when navigating between different articles.
Regarding me "removing substantial sourced claims", I at least kept the references for the suspended states because without them the list would be a little redundant. Underdwarf58 (talk) 05:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Changing the others to match this style would be a consistent format. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 05:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's what you think, but I personally disagree because it will make those articles longer to read. Plus it's too late because every other 'Bilateral relations' article have a list like I made for this article. If you think that's the case, go complain to User talk:Semsûrî or User talk:Akiro 2021 because they are also responsible for those lists, not just me. Underdwarf58 (talk) 06:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, it's not an opinion: if all the articles have the same style, that is by definition consistency. You're conflating an opinion and a fact here. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
But like I said, it is already too late to change the other lists just as you like. Underdwarf58 (talk) 06:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Any of them can be changed to anything. It is in no sense "too late". ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Why not I undo my edit on this page so that I don't start a war here? Underdwarf58 (talk) 06:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
To be clear, I will in no sense be edit-warring, nor will I revert at all, nor am I allowed to do so. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 07:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply