Talk:Foreshock

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Foreshock is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earthquakes High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Foreshock appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2002 Sumatra earthquake is considered to be a foreshock of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

Wikipedia

Purpose of the table

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

It's not clear to me how the table of examples is really helping. It's just becoming yet another list of earthquakes. Either it needs to be reorganised to provide examples from different settings - extensional, thrust and strike-slip and a few examples perhaps of the variation in amount of delay or it should go. Mikenorton (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I also think that the number of columns is excessive and that some of them are irrelevant - does it matter whether the mainshock triggered a tsunami? or what the mainshock's maximum intensity was? wouldn't the intensity of the foreshock be of more interest?. I've started to make the table more concise, removing the deaths and tsunami columns and replacing them with "Type" and "Comments", moving citations to the latter. Mikenorton (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Mainshock" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mainshock. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 18#Mainshock until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic