Talk:Forestdale, London
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forestdale, Croydon to Forestdale, London? Why?
editWhy was this changed from Forestdale, Croydon to Forestdale, London? Forestdale is most certainly part of Croydon, in the same way as Selsdon, Purley, Coulsdon are. Croydon on the whole is part of London, yes. So are we going to change all the Croydon villages to London? Not likely, surely? We seem to have a right old mess with these Croydon villages. We have Norbury, Coulsdon, Selsdon, and Sanderstead, but Purley, London; Forestdale, London; Addington, London; and Shirley, London. Well, they either are entirely on their own, belong to London or belong to Croydon. What is it to be? I can assure you Forestdale, Purley, Addington, Shirley, Sanderstead, Norbury, Coulsdon and Selsdon are very much part of Croydon. Forestdale is one of the original CR0 postcodes, purely Croydon. You can't have it both ways. Dieter Simon 22:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC), Dieter Simon 15:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Any district with an unambiguous name is given an article at that name. However, if you go to Purley, Forestdale, Addington etc. you will discover that they are disambiguation pages. The convention for disambiguating London districts is to simply make them "XXXXX, London". That convention is apparent across all articles about London districts. DJR (T) 17:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Forestdale, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090820041600/http://www.cda.org.uk/megab2/build/solaris/IS1.htm to http://www.cda.org.uk/megab2/build/solaris/IS1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)