Talk:Forgery/Archives/2014
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Forgery as an important subject outside the art market
This article, and/or other articles (e.g. digital forensics), need a section or a link to a thorough discussion of techniques and motivations for faking photographs and audio/visual recordings, and ways of detecting such fakes. Forgery should be seen not only in the context of the art market, but also in the contexts of journalism, reliability of evidence in judicial proceedings, and political propaganda. There is some discussion of parts of the subject in the articles such as Media coverage of the Arab–Israeli conflict, and Photo_manipulation but the subject deserves unified coverage in its own right somewhere in Wikipedia. Perhaps it exists already, but I haven't been able to find it.CharlesHBennett (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Scotland
In view of the vague exception, I don't know if forgery is illegal in Scotland or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.87.243.66 (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)