Talk:Formosan languages

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Koeawila in topic Undue weight problems in the "Origins" section

Sources and materials on Favorlang and Siraya (extinct Formosan languages)

edit

Favorlang language

The articles of Christian instruction in Favorlang-Formosan, Dutch and English, from Vertrecht's manuscript of 1650 : with Psalmanazar's dialogue between a Japanese and a Formosan, and Happart's Favorlang vocabulary (1896)

https://archive.org/details/cu31924026424675

Dictionary of the Favorlang dialect of the Formosan language, tr. by W.H. Medhurst (1840)

https://archive.org/details/dictionaryfavor00happgoog

Siraya

Sinckan Manuscript studies

http://books.google.com/books?id=5CDUYQ3S-V0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=hlnKRaZ0f4QC&pg=PA35#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=hlnKRaZ0f4QC&pg=PA36#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=abMMAQAAMAAJ

Revival

http://lingdy.aacore.jp/doc/indonesiacurrenttrend/alexander_adelaar_p.pdf

Malay and Javanese Loanwords in Malagasy, Tagalog and Siraya

http://www.sabrizain.org/malaya/library/loanwords.pdf

A comparative vocabulary of Formosan languages and dialects

https://archive.org/details/comparativevocab19ogaw

Austronesian language course at National Tsing Hua University

http://www.ling.nthu.edu.tw/faculty/hcliao/Tsing%20Hua%20courses/Fall%202011_AN%20lg%20contact.pdf

Rajmaan (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Formosan languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Formosan languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Geographic grouping?

edit

Are the Formosan languages a geographic/ethnic grouping? As far as I can tell, there is not "Formosan" genetic language family. The Verified Cactus 100% 01:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


@The Verified Cactus: No, or at the very least not entirely, as they are all Austronesian languages, but it is Paraphyletic as the grouping of "Formosan languages" includes all of the Austronesian branches/subfamilies other than the Malayo-Polynesian languages. As for it being geographic, I suppose one could to a lesser extent argue that as well, because they do all happen to be spoken on the island of Taiwan (formerly known as Formosa, hence the name). However, it is not exclusively Geographic by any means, or else it might include the other, unrelated Languages of Taiwan, whereas the more strictly paraphyletic Formosan family only includes those which have descended from Proto-Austronesian, meaning it is still a phylogenetic grouping to at least some extent.

"Several others"

edit

"Of the approximately 26 languages of the Taiwanese aborigines, at least ten are extinct, another four (perhaps five) are moribund, and several others are to some degree endangered." Aren't all remaining Formosan languages endangered? As far as I can see, even the remaining Formosan languages are hardly spoken by younger people. Can't we just change the latter clause into "all others are to some degree endangered"? Steinbach (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A reliable source is needed for any and all statements on Wikipedia.50.111.1.254 (talk) 04:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Undue weight problems in the "Origins" section

edit

Currently, the "Origins" section on this page has no content other than a summary of a manuscript by Roger Blench which rejects the existence of a "Proto-Austronesian" language. This violates Wikipedia's policies wrt Due and undue weight , because this view is in the extreme minority: I am unaware of any academic source that agrees with Blench on this claim, versus the copious sources that clearly affirm the existence of a Proto-Austronesian language. It also makes this page strangely inconsistent/contradictory with other pages on Austronesian languages and Austronesian-speaking peoples. An article that accounted for the well-attested views in the scholarship I think would sufficiently discuss the origin of the Formosan languages by simply containing a sentence noting that they are (near) universally understood to derive from a Proto-Austronesian language, and would contain a hyperlink to that page, and/or potentially a link to the page on Austronesian peoples.

Koeawila (talk) 02:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply