Talk:Fornication
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fornication article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 50 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 50 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Same partial paragraph in 3 Wikipedia entries
editAs a result of a Google search, I discovered the same five-sentence text in three different entries: Fornication, Christian tradition and Infallibility of the Church. I don't have expertise in this subject area so perhaps someone who does could have a look and decide if it should be deleted from this entry. This is the text:
In his book, James F. Keenan reports studies by some academics. A study by Bernard Hoose states that claims to a continuous teaching by the Church on matters of sexuality, life and death and crime and punishment are "simply not true". After examining seven medieval text about homosexuality, Mark Jordan argues that, "far from being consistent, any attempt to make a connection among the texts proved impossible". He calls the tradition's teaching of the Church "incoherent". Karl-Wilhelm Merks considers that tradition itself is "not the truth guarantor of any particular teaching." Soperd (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)