Talk:Fort Amherst
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Amherst article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discussion of the problems of Thursday 14th November 2008
editThese issues are extremely serious, and need to be considered in detail before a balanced paragraph can be written so I have moved the discussion here. At the moment, this is rolling news, and while of extreme importance, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a blog, but editors do need to keep themselves informed of the situation- so it does need to be reported here. It will helpful if references can be given ie Council Minute Book paragraphs, Medway Messenger reports, and any conflicts of interest declared. ClemRutter (talk) 00:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC) Former RuMCC Councillor
TRANSFERRED FROM ARTICLE
- On Thursday 14th November 2008 the Amherst Heritage Centre board of directors were informed by the Fort Amherst Heritage Trust that they were going ahead with the merger of another Charity Based on the Site and if the Amherst Heritage Centre did not join the Trust a continued block on bookings would continue. The Directors of AHC where also informed if they did not choose to merge they would have to leave Fort Amherst. Faced with this Dilemma the Directors of the Amherst Heritage Centre felt they had no other option but to give into the Blackmail of the trustees of Fort Amherst and agree with the principal to merge.
- Earlier in 2008 the Amherst Heritage Centre Repetitive on the Fort Amherst Heritage Trust Board was voted off, leaving the Amherst Heritage Centre unrepresented and ultimately without a voice.
/TRANSFERRED FROM ARTICLE
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fort Amherst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071014022046/http://chathamworldheritage.co.uk:80/ to http://www.chathamworldheritage.co.uk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Amherst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140302153041/http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/001_2011WEB.pdf to http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/001_2011WEB.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://chathamworldheritage.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)