Talk:Fort Canning MRT station
Latest comment: 3 years ago by ArnabSaha in topic GA Review
 | Fort Canning MRT station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 24, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fort Canning MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 12:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
edit- The citations need to be edited. Like citation [21] - "LTA | News Room | News Releases | Factsheet: Downtown Line 3 to Open on 21 October 2017". Just write "Factsheet: Downtown Line 3 to Open on 21 October 2017".
- The Singapore MRT articles I reviewed, they have "Art-in-Transit programme" mentioned. Maybe make a article on this and wikilink them to the station articles. It seems notable for an article.
- Any image of the artwork?
- "developments around the station includes Clarke Quay" - Include
- "Clarke Quay, Liang Court, Robertson Quay, UE Shopping Mall and Fort Canning Park, in addition to religious sites such as the Church of Sacred Heart and Sri Thendayupathani Temple." - Any wikilinks for these?
- The coordinate seems incorrect on GMaps.
- "The debris along the tunnels’ route were removed" - was.
- "stations and tunnels started on that month" - ommit "on"
- Remove "www" from website names in citation.
Fixed Changed all www.lta.gov.sg to Land Transport Authority
- Any more details regarding the opening?
- As far as I know, there are no further significant news regarding the station.
- "River Valley MRT station in August 2010" - Month/Year not mentioned in body.
Done Added mention
- Some wikilinks are missing like Chinatown station.
- Done
- Author not mentioned in citation [13]. Check the other ones too.
- Done
- Add citations for the platform level and disabld access in Infobox.
- Done
Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 12:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Addressed the issues above. Some of the locations stated in the article has already been linked in the lead, such as Liang Court and Clarke Quay. Also fixed the coordinates. I am currently working on the artwork page at the moment under Art and Architecture on the MRT network.--ZKang123 (talk) 08:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- add redlink for the Art and Architecture article. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 08:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- @ZKang123: you can put wikilinks twice in lead and in the body. Link the first "Bencoolen station", "Land Transport Authority" in body. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 16:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- also mark the things as Done Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 16:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Good to go Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 13:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- also mark the things as
- @ZKang123: you can put wikilinks twice in lead and in the body. Link the first "Bencoolen station", "Land Transport Authority" in body. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 16:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)