Talk:Fort Saskatchewan/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 22:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@CplKlinger: I have checked all of the images and found that they are acceptable. The most recent edit to this page was September 26, 2020, so it is stable. Through a reading of this page I found no neutrality problems. In my reading I also found that it covers the broad history, notable inhabitants, geography, demographics, culture, etc. Now the long part of the review will start with me looking over ever single citation on the page to make sure that the article is verifiable which will take a few hours. Jon698 (talk) 22:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@CplKlinger: I have finally completed looking through all of the references and found that all of them have the information they are referencing. Article accepted. Jon698 (talk) 00:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·