Talk:Fort Toulouse and Fort Jackson

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Jackson (Alabama). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080111045236/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=72&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=72&ResourceType=Site

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

merger proposal

I propose to merge Fort Toulouse into Fort Jackson (Alabama) and to move/rename to Fort Toulouse and Fort Jackson or similar. The current articles are duplicative, and both feature photo of just one of the places. The pair are named together as a state historic site and as a U.S. National Historic Landmark. It would be easier to explain both together in one article than try to explain to readers why two very overlapping articles should be separate (which is simply not done, is not clear). A merged article would be of very reasonable size, not much longer than either.

The merger target was created by me in 2007 and covered both topics. The Fort Toulouse was possibly created in 2008 (see this earliest version I can find available edited by User:Abncavscout, but the edit summary and tags on the page suggest that an earlier copy-vio verson had existed and was rewritten by Abncavscout. Actually, editors of the merged article would do well to go back to that version to get some detail that has been lost. --Doncram (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

• Merge There's no point in trying to connect them. Wp9097 (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

I think that the intention of Wp9097 was to support the merge, so given this and the overlap,   Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)